When to have sex when you are dating someone new
There's no right number of dates before sex. The honest answer is "when both people want to, have talked about it, and feel okay about it", and that can be the first night, the fifth date or the sixth month. If you came here for a number, the survey data below shows the range people report, and why none of it works as a rule.
This post doesn't tell you to wait or not to wait. Plenty of people choose each, for reasons that make sense to them. It covers what's been measured, what hasn't, and how to settle on a pace with the person in front of you.
What people say, and what they do
A YouGov poll fielded from January 30 to February 1, 2026, asked 1,104 US adult citizens, from YouGov's opt-in panel, how long a couple should be together before having sex. The article reports that 31% said the minimum wait should be two to seven months, and 22% said between one week and one month. The margin of error was about 4 points for the full sample, and the article doesn't give a full breakdown of every answer. The poll measures opinions about what people think is appropriate, not what they do. It's also an opt-in online panel, so it isn't a random sample of everyone.
Behavior looks different from opinion. In a study of married or cohabiting couples with children, nearly 600 couples from the 2006 Marital and Relationship Survey, Sharon Sassler, Daniel Lichter and Fenaba Addo reported that more than one-third began having sex within the first month of the relationship and about one-quarter waited more than six months (Journal of Marriage and Family, 2012, as reported by the Cornell Chronicle). The sample is low- to moderate-income couples with children who were still together, so it says little about relationships that ended or people in other situations.
Put together: in that poll, many people named a wait of weeks to months, and actual timing in the couples study was spread across a wide range. Neither tells you what to do.
What studies say about timing and relationship quality
Researchers have asked whether the timing of first sex is linked to how the relationship goes later. The results depend on the group studied, and they only show associations.
- Willoughby, Carroll and Busby (Journal of Sex Research, 2014). Using data from 10,932 people in unmarried romantic relationships, the authors compared four patterns: sex before dating, sex on the first date or soon after, sex after several weeks of dating, and no sex. Waiting was generally linked to better satisfaction, stability and communication. Relationship length changed the pattern, and among couples together more than two years, early sex was linked to worse outcomes.
- Sassler, Lichter and Addo (2012). In the married and cohabiting couples above, women who had sex soonest reported lower relationship satisfaction than women who waited longer, and men who waited reported higher commitment and less conflict. The Cornell Chronicle summary also links early sex to moving in together sooner, and notes that how fast a relationship moves may reflect economic and cultural factors. It describes associations, not proven causes.
Read these carefully. Both are self-reported surveys. Neither can show that the timing caused the outcome: people who wait may differ in values, religious practice, past experience or how they handle commitment, and any of those could affect both the timing and the relationship. Averages also leave room for plenty of exceptions in both directions. Waiting doesn't guarantee a good match, and early sex doesn't rule one out. Nobody should treat this as a rulebook.
Why "rules" don't help much
Rules like "wait three dates" or "never on the first night" hand the decision to a number. That can mean doing something you aren't ready for because the count came up, or holding back from something you both want. They also hide an assumption about what sex means.
It means different things. For one person it's a step toward commitment. For another it's a good evening with no link to what comes after. Both are valid, which is why casual dating expectations and moving fast or slow matter more than any count of dates.
How two people can decide together
A few things tend to help.
Know your own answer first. Do you want it soon, later or not yet? Is it linked to feeling secure, to being exclusive, or to nothing in particular? There's no correct answer, just yours.
Say it in plain words, outside the moment. Over coffee, not during a kiss. Lines you could use:
- "I'm enjoying getting to know you. I'd like to take things at a pace that feels good for both of us. How do you feel about that?"
- "I'm not in a hurry. Is there anything that would help you feel comfortable?"
- "I'd like to be on the same page about what this is before we get more physical."
Ask what it means to her. "What would sleeping together mean to you?" is a fair question and not an interrogation. Take the answer at face value.
Treat a mismatch as information. If you want it sooner and she wants it later, or the other way around, the answer isn't to talk the other person down. It's to decide whether the pace works for you, or part kindly. Nobody owes anyone sex after dinner, a gift or a good evening.
Keep consent ongoing. Agreeing in principle isn't agreement in the moment. Anyone can change their mind at any point, and a hesitation or a no means stop. Planned Parenthood notes that people who are drunk, high or passed out can't consent.
Cover protection and testing before it comes up. STIs, testing and safe sex goes through what the CDC says. It's a good conversation to have earlier than you think.
If you feel pressure, from either side
Pressure can come from a partner, from friends, from the idea that "everyone else is" or from a sense that you're behind. It can also be internal. If the reason you'd do it is to avoid an awkward moment or to prove something, that's usually worth a pause. If the reason is that you want to and so does she, you're fine. Neither early nor late is a moral position, and neither should be a source of shame or bragging.
What to do next
- Write your own answer to "what pace feels right to me, and why?" in one sentence.
- Pick a calm moment in the first few dates to say it. Use one of the lines above.
- Ask her version and wait through the pause. Don't fill it with arguments.
- If you differ, decide within a week whether the pace works, instead of leaving it hanging.
- Talk testing and protection before the first time, not after.
- Check in at the time. "Still good?" is a normal question.
This is general information, not medical advice. For questions about sexual health, talk to a doctor or clinic.
Sources
- YouGov: How long Americans think couples should be together before having sex, getting married and buying a home together (poll fielded Jan 30 to Feb 1, 2026; 1,104 US adult citizens, opt-in panel, margin of error about 4 points)
- Cornell Chronicle (2012): "Fools rush in? Sex early in a relationship linked to later dissatisfaction," on Sassler, Addo and Lichter, Journal of Marriage and Family; nearly 600 couples, 2006 Marital and Relationship Survey
- Willoughby, Carroll and Busby, "Differing relationship outcomes when sex happens before, on, or after first dates," Journal of Sex Research (BYU ScholarsArchive); 10,932 people; abstract only
- Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountains: Sexual consent