Run Game The game

Push-pull: what it is and what to do instead

6 min read

Push-pull is a pickup term for alternating between showing interest in someone ("pull") and showing distance or indifference ("push"). The claim behind it is that a mix of warmth and uncertainty creates more attraction than steady warmth would. That is the tactic's own claim, not an established finding. If you've seen "hot and cold" as a texting complaint, it's the same pattern seen from the receiving end.

This article explains where the idea came from, what research exists, what it costs, and what to do if you want the same playful spark without the games.

Where it comes from

Push-pull shows up in pickup material of the 2000s. Shortform's summary of Neil Strauss's The Game (2005) lists "maintain a push-pull balance" among the keys to the Mystery Method, so the other person stays engaged. A summary of the book by Dan Silvestre defines it as giving indications of disinterest followed by indications of interest, and says the sequence can take place in a few seconds or over time, as in a friendly phone call followed by a distant one. Shortform gives a small version of the idea: showing interest in a conversation, then glancing around the room as if distracted.

It overlaps with other tactics from the same scene. David DeAngelo's "cocky and funny" (see his profile) is described as pairing a compliment with a playful retraction, which has the same shape. Negging is a related and more contested tactic, covered in negging: what it is and why it backfires.

The same pattern can also stretch over days: warm one day, distant the next, or replies delayed on purpose. In texting, this is what many people mean by someone running hot and cold.

What the research says

We didn't find a study of push-pull as a pickup technique. The closest evidence is one well-known experiment on uncertainty.

In 2011, Erin Whitchurch, Timothy Wilson and Daniel Gilbert published "He loves me, he loves me not" in Psychological Science. Female University of Virginia students, who believed they were in an online dating study, looked at the Facebook profiles of men. Some were told a man liked them a lot, some were told he rated them as average, and some weren't told how he felt. The women were most attracted to the men whose feelings were unknown, more than to the men who were said to like them a lot. They also reported thinking about those men more often.

Take the limits seriously. The women were reacting to the profile of a stranger who didn't exist as described, in a setting set up by researchers. The uncertainty came from missing information, not from someone acting warm and then cold. According to the Association for Psychological Science write-up, the women had no information about how choosy the men were in general, so the study can't show whether a man who is uniformly hard to get would get the same result, and it didn't follow any relationship over time. So the result is consistent with mystery raising interest at the very start of online contact. It doesn't show that deliberately alternating interest and distance works with a real person you're getting to know.

What it costs

Its proponents present push-pull as light and playful. These are the objections people commonly raise, which are opinions rather than research findings, so weigh them yourself.

On the other side, a common argument for it is that it keeps someone from coming on too strong and keeps things light. Many people enjoy playfulness and a little mystery. You can get both without the withdrawal part.

What to do instead

The honest version of the same spark is playful teasing and real interest. In a 2001 review in Psychological Bulletin, Dacher Keltner and colleagues defined a tease as an intentional provocation, accompanied by playful markers, that comments on something relevant to the target, and noted that teasing can lead to either hostile or affiliative outcomes. The definition includes playful markers, which the review describes as things like exaggerated facial expressions and changes in voice, so a tease that works is one the other person can read as play.

If she says no or goes quiet, that's her answer. Don't read it as part of a push-pull cycle and try again. More on playful teasing is in playful teasing and banter, and on honest flirting in how to flirt in person.

What to do next

  1. Check your own pattern. For a week, note any time you pulled back on purpose (slow reply, vague answer, acting bored). Count them.
  2. Try five light teases this week, each about something small and shared. Note whether she laughed or teased back.
  3. Set a rule for texting. As a rule of thumb, reply when you see it and have a real answer, instead of waiting on purpose.
  4. Make one clear invite this week with a day, a place and a time.
  5. Write a one-line note after each conversation, such as warm, flat or she pulled away, so you can see what you do when you like someone.
  6. Read the reaction. If she looks uncomfortable, stop teasing and ask a real question.

If you want a place to track those conversations, Run Game lets you log each approach as Success or Rejected with an optional note, and Stats shows your success rate and outcome funnel. Any notes app works as well.

Sources