Run Game The game

Negging: what it is, where it came from, and what coaches teach now

Updated 4 min read

Negging is giving someone a backhanded compliment or a mild put-down. It's the most widely known tactic the pickup community produced. Merriam-Webster defines "neg" as manipulating someone by eroding their confidence and self-esteem. Here's where it came from, how practitioners explained it, and what many coaches teach instead.

What it is

A neg is a comment that sounds partly like a compliment and partly like a criticism, usually aimed at something small about the other person: their clothes, a quirk, a habit. It's the same pattern as a pointed "you look great, have you lost weight?" or "you're brave to wear that," which people encounter outside dating too.

This article doesn't list example negs. The goal is to explain the concept, not to supply lines.

Where it came from

Dictionaries date this sense of "neg" to the late 1990s, when men were swapping techniques on online forums such as the Usenet group alt.seduction.fast. It reached a mass audience in 2005 through Neil Strauss's The Game, and The Observer singled it out in its coverage of the book. Wikipedia credits Mystery (Erik von Markovik) with popularizing it. For background, see Neil Strauss and The Game, Mystery and the Mystery Method, and a short history of the pickup community.

How practitioners described its purpose

The explanations varied by teacher, but two come up most:

That last use is the one that earned the dictionary definition.

Where the pattern shows up in other advice

Negging overlaps with a nearby idea from David DeAngelo's Double Your Dating (2001): "cocky and funny," a mix of mock arrogance and humor. DeAngelo's example is a compliment followed by a playful retraction: "I like you, you're good fun. But you're too much trouble." He taught reading the reaction. If she laughs or teases back, she's playing along. If she pushes back, adjust. If she looks offended, you've gone too far. See David DeAngelo and Double Your Dating.

Mark Manson's Models (2011) took the opposite route and argued that most tactics, including this one, are ways of managing impressions. His alternative was to say what you actually think and feel. See Mark Manson's Models.

What coaches teach now: playful teasing

Much current material uses "teasing" or "banter" rather than negs. The research frame comes from psychologist Dacher Keltner, who co-wrote a 2001 Psychological Bulletin review called "Just teasing." Tone of voice and facial expression are what tell someone a tease is playful.

Playful teasing Negging
Aimed at the situation or a shared joke Aimed at the person's looks, intelligence, or worth
Goes both ways; they can tease you back Aimed to put you "above" them
Both people are smiling Meant to land as a small sting
Drops right away if it doesn't land Treated as a tactic to push through

Typical teasing material is about what you're both experiencing. A line that hasn't moved in ten minutes ("I think we live here now") or the fact that you both ordered the same drink. You can also tease yourself.

If a tease lands badly, say "sorry, that came out wrong" and move on. For fuller coverage, see playful teasing and banter and how to flirt in person.

What to do next

  1. Use a sincere, specific compliment. "I like your jacket. Where's it from?" gives her something to answer. Try it on 3 people this week.
  2. Tease the situation, not the person. Make one observation about where you both are: the line, the weather, the music. Do this twice this week.
  3. Tease yourself once. "I'm terrible at choosing, I've been staring at this menu for five minutes."
  4. Read the reaction. Smiles and a tease back mean continue. A flat face means stop and move to a normal question.
  5. Add a callback. Reference something funny from earlier in the conversation once, to build an inside joke.
  6. Log it. Record each approach in Run Game as Success or Rejected, and note whether a tease landed. After 10, see how often it did.
  7. If she says she's not interested, thank her and go.

Sources