Run Game Practice

Dating goals you can control (and a sample month)

6 min read

If you're setting dating goals, the first test is simple: can you hit it without anyone else's permission? "Talk to four new people this week" passes. "Get a girlfriend by March" doesn't, because it depends on someone else's feelings, timing and choices as much as on you.

That doesn't make the big goal wrong. It makes it a poor weekly target. This post splits goals into the ones you control and the ones you don't, then walks through a sample month.

Outcome goals and process goals

An outcome goal is the result you want. A process goal is the action that gives that result a chance.

Outcome (partly out of your hands) Process (fully yours)
Get a girlfriend Go to 2 social events a week
Get 5 numbers Start 10 conversations with people you're interested in
Have a second date Ask 2 people out this month
Feel confident Do one thing that scares you at 4 out of 10, three times a week

Outcomes make a good direction. Process goals make a good week. If you only track outcomes, a month of real effort can look like zero, and that's exactly when people quit.

What the goal-setting research says (and doesn't)

The best-known body of work on this is Edwin Locke and Gary Latham's goal-setting theory. In a 2002 summary in American Psychologist, they report that specific, difficult goals consistently led to higher performance than telling people to "do your best." The effect sizes (d) they cite from earlier meta-analyses ranged from .42 to .80 for that comparison, and from .52 to .82 for goal difficulty. Performance leveled off or dropped only when people reached the limits of their ability or when commitment to a very hard goal lapsed.

Four caveats matter here. That research is mostly about work and lab tasks, not dating. Effect sizes aren't percentages. The research favors difficult goals, while the sample month below uses numbers you can reach on a normal week, which is a practical judgment about keeping going and not something the paper tested. And the same paper notes that on new, complex tasks, a specific learning goal (how many strategies or ideas you pick up) can work better than a performance goal. Dating is complicated, and nobody can guarantee a result. So treat the research as support for two ideas: make goals specific, and for a skill you're still learning, include a goal about what you learn.

"Do your best" is close to "see how it goes." It's easy to meet and easy to let slide.

Pick goals from four buckets

You don't need all of them. Choose a few and set a number you could hit on a normal week.

  1. Exposure. Places and events: "Go out twice a week to somewhere people talk to each other" (a class, a run club, a climbing gym, a board game night).
  2. Conversations. Starting them: "Talk to 5 new people this week." They don't all need to be romantic.
  3. Asks. The step most people skip: "Ask one person for their number or to get coffee."
  4. Learning. One thing per outing: "Ask one follow-up question in every conversation" or "Hold eye contact through my first sentence."

Add one rule against the obvious risk: a numbers goal can turn into box-ticking. Keep the learning goal in the mix so each conversation is also practice at being curious about the other person. And if she says no or isn't interested, that conversation still counts. You stop, and you move on.

A sample month

This is a template for someone who is fairly new to meeting people in person and has about 3 free evenings a week. The numbers are a rule of thumb. Scale them up or down, but keep them hard enough that you'd notice if you skipped.

Week Exposure Conversations Asks Learning goal
1 2 outings 5 short chats (any person, any topic) 0 Say hello first, smile, keep it under 2 minutes
2 2 outings 5 chats, at least 2 with people you find attractive 0 Ask one follow-up question per chat
3 3 outings 6 chats, at least 3 with people you find attractive 1 (number or coffee) Notice when the other person leans in or looks away, and adjust
4 3 outings 6 chats 2 Write a 3-line note after each outing

End of month: one 20-minute review. Count what you did against the plan. A missed number tells you what to adjust, and it isn't a grade on you.

Make the goals fit your life

What outcome goals are good for

You can still want a girlfriend. Write it down once, at the top of the page, as the reason for the plan. Then look at it every few months, not every day. If three months of solid process goals produce no second dates, the plan, not your worth, is the thing to adjust. How to get a girlfriend in 2026 lays out a 12-week version, and the 100 approaches challenge is a longer, count-based option.

Tracking it

In Run Game, you can log each approach as Success or Rejected with an optional note, then check Stats for totals, streaks and success rate. For process goals, the counts are the scoreboard; the success rate is an outcome number, so read it as information and not as the grade. Write your weekly learning goal in the session notes.

What to do next

  1. Write your outcome goal on one line, then draw a line under it. Everything below the line has to be something you control.
  2. Choose one goal from each of the four buckets, with a number you could hit even in a rough week.
  3. Put the first outing in your calendar today, with a day, time and place.
  4. Copy the sample month if you like, and change any number that feels easy or impossible.
  5. Keep a simple tally for a week in a notes app or a log: outings, chats, asks.
  6. Do a 20-minute review at the end of week 4: what you hit, what you missed, one number to raise and one to lower.
  7. If you hit every number for the month, raise one of them a little (a rule of thumb: about a fifth). If you missed most, cut the plan in half and run it again. Smaller and finished beats big and abandoned. Why tracking your approaches makes you better at them explains the logging habit.

Sources